Although every answer to these questions leads to a different interpretation, 2 given the traditional opposition of satire to archaic tragedy bequeathed by Lucilius3 many scholars agree that “[ w] hatever the case, Accius and Pacuvius come in for criticism” and note that “[ t] heir works suffer from the same maladies that infect their revivalist advocates”.
4 It is a known fact that the high style of epic and tragedy, the 1 W.
The political satire was born during the age of Milton.
Samuel Butler in his satirical poem Hudibras satirizes the dishonourable behaviour of his age; the poem was very popular in its time and stays as a best piece of its kind before the age of Dryden.
The form of the satire may change, and the quality and strength of a satire may have piercing or frank and direct effect based on the demands of that time.
Alexander Pope’s poetry is either satirical in tone or it have the greatest power of satire, moreover satire is an essential feature of Pope’s poetry. (ed.), Die römische Satire, Darmstadt, 1970 (Wege der Forschung, 238), p. FISKE, “ Lucilius and Persius”, TAPh A 40 (1909), p. KORZENIEWSKI, “ Die erste Satire des Persius”, in ID. The age of Enlightenment, the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, produced a great popularity of satire in Britain, and the emotion of these satires were stirred up by the rise of partisan politics.The then century writers such as Dryden, Swift and Pope satirize their personal and political enemies, and moreover their satires rise from the personal level to the impersonal level.Though Pope’s satire is similar to Horace in terms of tone, sometimes his criticism is filled with anger, critical, and strong hate like that of Juvenal.During the middle ages, church and women become the objects of satire.Based on the view of Dryden, the true purpose of satire is, “the correction amendment of vices by correction” (Satire Quotes).Basically, satire is of two kinds, personal and impersonal satire; the personal satire is short lived, has only little permanency and is targeted towards the individual, and so the effect of the personal satire is in the hands of the master; whereas the impersonal satire has wider range, the target is universal rather than the individual, and provides finest achievements when compared to the personal tragedy.One of the most difficult passages in Persius’ first satire is the one regarding archaic Roman tragedy in lines 1, 76-78. In Clausen’s OCT edition1 the text runs as follows: est nunc Brisaei quem uenosus liber Acci, sunt quos Pacuuiusque et uerrucosa moretur Antiopa aerumnis cor luctificabile fulta? The Scholia on his Satires are cited according to the recent Teubner edition of W.