Tags: Essay Comparing Romeo And Juliet And West Side StoryMlk Jr I Have A Dream Speech EssayEssays That WorkedYouth Violence EssayGeorgetown University Application Essay PromptsStart Creative Writing
Nevertheless, the Court has already accepted a series of important cases involving judicial elections, drugs and crime, and the rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
Supreme Court Justices are unelected and hold lifelong terms in office.
Officials that are appointed by the President or a party usually have that person or party’s interests in mind.
The last Supreme Court term, which ended in June, featured more ideologically polarized 5-4 decisions than at any time in the Court's history.
The new term, which begins on October 1, may not produce quite as many sparks: the cases the Court has agreed to hear are less controversial than the array of issues involving abortion, race, religion, and campaign finance that divided the justices last term.
Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student.
This is not an example of the work produced by our Law Essay Writing Service.
If one is found to be unfit for the job, there is no plausible way to remove him because of incompetence alone.
Besides the downfall of lifelong judges, there are a few understandable advantages; the benefits of having unelected justices are numbered, but very important.
But I'm especially interested in the perspective of the Court's senior Associate Justice, John Paul Stevens, whom I recently had an opportunity to interview for the NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE.
(Here is a link to the full article.) At 87 years old, Stevens has served on the Court for 32 years, and in four years will surpass the all-time longevity record set by his predecessor, William O. Because of his seniority, Stevens has the important power to decide who will write the majority opinion for the Court when Chief Justice John Roberts is in dissent, and to decide who will write the principal dissent when the chief justice is in the majority.