Although leadership is an integral function of management, these two have primary distinction that when properly understood would lead to effective implementation of leadership activities in a given situation.
According to Kotter (1998), leadership complements management; the former manages with change, while the latter copes with complexity.
Functionalists have been known to treat terms related to mental states as a mental state functional characterization which differs from input and output terms.
Therefore in a (simplified Turing –machine assumption of the theory,) mental states are associated with the states of the Turing-machine, which own on their own are clearly defined by a machine table which mentions outputs and outputs that are explored nonmentalistically.
This essay considers my personal......stratum of society is elected by the people as president, member parliament or other administrative position.
The philosophy of true leaderships takes the leader as person, who is free from ethnic, racial, religious, regional, gender and other prejudices.
The very version of functionalism, however, fails to tack down functional descriptions at the most important point with descriptions of outputs and inputs that are relatively specific.
Instead this form of functionalism merely specifies inputs, states and outputs only by insisting that they be outputs, inputs and states.
Additionally functionalism empathizes that characterization of mental states ought to include descriptions of outputs and inputs in both its non-machine and machine versions.
The variation between Psychofunctionalism and Functionalism brings forth a difference in specifying outputs and inputs.