The problem is that not all people are good and some people may take advantage of mercy killing.
Firstly, one of the relatives may try to kill a person to come into an inheritance.
The people who work at this company are very professional and well qualified. I will be recommending you to anyone who wants a good writing service.
I guess you know that your writers are experts in Economics.
For instance, an attempt is not successful and that person is critically ill.
With the right for relatives to agree to euthanasia, nobody will ever know what has happened.On the other hand, the data in Oregon is scarce to argue that legalizing mercy killing will not affect minorities. It always takes time till the prejudice enters a particular sphere.It is also possible that during those years there was simply no chance to choose between, for instance, a poor patient and a rich one.The government should not be in charge to decide who deserves painless death and who has to suffer no matter what he or she wants.Moreover, it is difficult for officials to consider all the details of every particular case.They also remind that it is significant to consider that a suffering patient may be a burden for his or her relatives after years of being in a coma.Moreover, they present evidence that legalizing mercy killing will not have a harmful effect on minorities.However, legalizing euthanasia may have negative consequences as well.The unwillingness of the government to legalize euthanasia does not mean that anybody wants patients to suffer.The statistics of deaths in Oregon prove that doctors do not violate the rights of the minorities; “although 2.6 percent of Oregonians are African American, no African American patients have chosen assisted suicide” (Ganzini).Mercy killing is legalized in Oregon and the data confirms that the minority groups do not prevail in the statistics of people who have agreed to euthanasia.