According to Armesto this is false because he was plagued by doubts, his sense of divine purpose grew gradually and his geographical ideas took shape slowly.According to Cecil Jane his objective was undefined and confused. “He invited the sovereigns to embrace an enterprise, the exact nature of which he refused to define.” Further the degree of his success is dependent upon how one sees and perceives him.
According to Armesto this is false because he was plagued by doubts, his sense of divine purpose grew gradually and his geographical ideas took shape slowly.According to Cecil Jane his objective was undefined and confused. “He invited the sovereigns to embrace an enterprise, the exact nature of which he refused to define.” Further the degree of his success is dependent upon how one sees and perceives him.Tags: Describe The Writing Test Items (Objective Essay Interpretive Type)Subway Restaurant Business PlanIntroduction To Holocaust EssayLearning Management System Dissertation ThesisAp English Lit And Composition EssaysEssay Models Of Human Resource ManagementTerm Paper OnStatistics On College EssaysPre Calc Homework Help
Second, Fernandez-Armesto indicates that some scholars use “imaginative reconstructions of what Columbus must have been thinking or doing at moments when the sources are silent.”  However, we are well-informed about Columbus because he has left many traces and writings of his own.
Third, many scholars think of Columbus as a uniquely single-minded figure.
The validity of the argument can be tested by considering the following counterfactual. Phillips indicates that undoubtedly someone else would soon have taken the step, even if Columbus had never lived. While it seems likely that the Americas would have eventually been discovered by someone else, this way of thinking would discredit any human discovery or invention.
Philips’s assumption is based on the notion that the right conditions were created and for that matter anyone could have discovered the Americas since many other men had similar ideas, dreams of discovering the world and establishing new trading routes.
Further I will focus on Columbus as a colonial governor and analyze his governance on Hispaniola.
Then we can put his successes and failures in perspective and determine how successful his undertakings really were. Not for conceiving an idea, but for turning an idea into reality.Although he did not find what he was initially looking for, the outcome of his undertaking was still positive by discovering a whole new landmass.Fernandez-Armesto reveals the historical debates on Columbus.Thus, it cannot be a compelling argument against Columbus to render him unsuccessful simply because he did not find what he was looking for.In fact, by discovering America, he indirectly found what he was looking for., it is the outcome of an undertaking, specified as achieving or failing its aims. In order to determine how successful Columbus really was, the outcome of his undertakings must be examined.One would instantly wonder how Columbus can even be considered successful when his original aim of reaching and finding a shortcut to India was not achieved.While the environment in the later part of the 15th century was conducive for exploration, Philips does not take into account that it takes more to turn an idea or conception into reality.Columbus was at the right time and the right place, and luck certainly played a role.His life as an explorer was very different to his life as a colonial governor.In addition, his contemporaries interpreted Columbus’s success in a different way than people do today with the benefit of hindsight by which the ramifications of his discovery are much more apparent.